Lenco Heaven
October 16, 2024, 09:55:45 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Cassette revival?  (Read 283 times)
Austrokiwi
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 168


« on: March 10, 2024, 04:14:11 PM »

TLDR: Every so often I read that the Cassette revival is still happening. My recent experience suggests to me that what ever revival there may be is stalling and sputtering to a halt.   I just don't think there is enough infrastructure to support a real cassette revival

My experience:
Back in 2018 the vibes were cassettes were going to be the next vinyl (my, possible, exaggeration).  I like legacy Hifi equipment (DAT, RTR, DCC, SACD, and of course records) and with a couple of boxes of cassettes in the Basement I  obtained an old dual well Akai (it came with a GX636 RTR I purchased).  It sounded terrible and only lasted a couple of years before the belts wore out.     It wasn’t worth restoring and I sold it on Ebay.  Not wanting to hiff out our old cassettes I started to hunt for a replacement cassette deck.  

Doing  some research I gained the impression getting cassette decks serviced is an issue,  I was to find out that servicing more of an issue than I realized.  I discovered a company in Germany that dealt with Braun Atieler products and who claimed they serviced those themselves.   So I purchased a Braun C3 from them.   I remember my enthusiasm when I found cassettes, on the C3, sounded better than I remembered. However, despite coming with a nice service report stating all that has been done to the deck, in a week I was sending it back because, it didn’t record. I was sent a replacement and it recorded but it just didn’t sound as good.   After about a year of infrequent use. I realized the right channel was not as loud as the left, and the deck just sounded tired.   It was too late to send it back (I didn't try).

I did some more research, of course I thought about a Nak dragon, decided for the money, and my  predominantly play-only use, that it just wasn't  a deck I could take advantage of.   I could spend more on music if I set my sights at a much more realistic price level. I ended up settling for the RX series of Naks( I love the auto-reverse system). In advance I decided I wasn’t going to believe any claimed servicing, and any deck I purchased would immediately be sent to someone reliable for servicing and upgrading.    I then went hunting to find someone with a good reputation for Servicing cassette decks who lived near to me.  I found such a person in Slovenia.

I then I went hunting for a RX deck. I didn’t care which model as my only requirement was that it be in almost perfect cosmetic condition. It took a good few months until a very clean RX 202 came up for sale.   The seller claimed it had been serviced, insisted he play some tapes on it for me.   Although it was only a 2 head deck, it worked well, it sounded great( to my ears) had all its parts, and was in great cosmetic condition.    I purchased it and a week later it was sent off to Slovenia for servicing.    I had to wait 3 months before it got to the front of the queue.  

I received the deck back in the middle of last year and  finally had a well performing cassette deck. I may have thought it was Ok when I purchased it, but, on return, it was considerably better sounding than I thought possible. The cassette loading and flipping mechanism, that I thought was issue free was now faster and much crisper.  

I still had the Braun and after the experience of the RX202 I was sure the Braun C3 could perform better. It was sent off to Slovenia and I received it back (4 months later) in mid February (2024).  It also came back functioning and sounding better than when I had purchased it. That so called serviced C3 required pinch roller replacement (one of them had become petrified) a belt replacement despite the deck having been sold to me as already having had a belt replacement. Apparently only the cassette drawer belt had been replaced (more was done but I won’t going into that here.    

Now, because of perseverance I have two well-functioning Cassette decks, I actually enjoy listening to cassettes now.   I wouldn't do it again ( Huge pain in the rear end)    My two decks might last another 20 years( if I am very lucky) but when they need servicing again I suspect it will be even harder to find someone competent to do the work.

« Last Edit: March 10, 2024, 06:35:02 PM by Austrokiwi » Logged
ropie
Administrator
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 12,340



WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2024, 05:21:01 PM »

All my first albums were bought on cassette - it was the late 80s / early 90s and vinyl had given way to CD and I couldn't afford a CD player. They served a purpose but I would not go back to them - they're way too restrictive and easily destroyed.

CDs, on the other hand, are extremely nice little objects and I even prefer them to vinyl shocked
Logged
floppybootstomp
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 73
Location: Greenwich
Posts: 3,581


« Reply #2 on: March 10, 2024, 09:12:55 PM »


Doing  some research I gained the impression getting cassette decks serviced is an issue,  I was to find out that servicing more of an issue than I realized.

When you say 'servicing' does this include a repair facility?

I ask as servicing of cassette decks is relatively straightforward (clean all moving parts inc. belt paths; clean head and pinch roller(s); adjust azimuth, if needed replace head; if needed replace belt(s); check all functions - I expect I've forgotten something here wink ) but finding somebody willing to repair them is somewhat problematic, shall we say.

I recently had a NAD cassette deck go faulty on me, it has no playback and the level bar indicators show no signal from tapes with recordings. I fear this may be a fault at PCB level. I phoned around half a dozen places offering Hi-Fi repairs and none were willing to even look at it.

I still have a fine functioning Yamaha deck and I will get round to attempting a repair on the NAD.

By coincidence yesterday evening I ripped two Maxell XLII C90s to WAV >> cda and now have two CDs of Pink Floyd at Knebworth 1990 and UFO at Knebworth 1985, both of which are excellent quality.
Logged

My real name is Tony
Austrokiwi
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 168


« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2024, 10:38:31 AM »

When you say 'servicing' does this include a repair facility?

I ask as servicing of cassette decks is relatively straightforward (clean all moving parts inc. belt paths; clean head and pinch roller(s); adjust azimuth, if needed replace head; if needed replace belt(s); check all functions - I expect I've forgotten something here wink ) but finding somebody willing to repair them is somewhat problematic, shall we say.



Includes repair ( even head lapping if required)
Logged
Colin_EJJ
Cotswold Meet
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 533


WWW
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2024, 11:25:15 AM »

Having used cassettes for many years, I find them easy to get on with and rather more enjoyable than messing about with computer files. There are good machines out there but you have to budget for a decent service. My two Tandbergs were done by a specialist who used to work for Tandberg UK (in fact, he serviced my open reel deck there in 1984!). I expect them to continue working well for many years to come.

But there are a lot of decks described as classic, high end etc on eBay which are anything but - as anyone who was around the first time around in the 1970s will be able to spot.
Logged
seiki-g
Member
***
Offline Offline

Location: Lower Saxony, Germany
Posts: 711


« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2024, 10:32:37 AM »

..Cassette recorder is still great, I am very satisfied with my B215 and the recordings are very good. Of course revised.
Logged

Best regards Georg

Without music, life would be a mistake.
                                               (F. Nietzsche)
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

2009-2024 LencoHeaven

Page created in 0.103 seconds with 18 queries.